Which practice can help develop students' critical thinking?

Providing opportunities for peer evaluation and feedback is a highly effective practice for developing students' critical thinking skills. This approach encourages students to articulate their thoughts, assess the contributions of their peers, and engage in reflective dialogue about various perspectives.

When students participate in peer evaluations, they have the chance to critically analyze not only their own work but also that of others, which deepens their understanding of the subject matter and promotes a more nuanced approach to problem-solving. This collaborative process fosters an environment where students can express differing viewpoints, challenge assumptions, and develop reasoned arguments, all of which are crucial elements of critical thinking.

In contrast, practices such as rote memorization, limiting discussions, and using strict lecture formats do not encourage students to engage deeply with the material or to think critically. Rote memorization focuses solely on recall rather than understanding, while limited discussions prevent the exploration of diverse ideas that can lead to critical thinking. Strict lecture formats can also inhibit student interaction and discourage them from questioning or engaging with the content, thus stifling the development of critical thought.